Camera: The camera is very high-quality, all the colours are very rich, which is aestically pleasing to the eye. Also, a lot of shadows are in some of the shots, which makes the lights and darks in the film contrast. I don't think that this is anything metaphorical.
Editing + Continuity: During the film, I would say, that there are a surprising amount of shots, it's very cut-heavy, which makes the pacing of the film really great. It gets a lot of infomation about his life in metal-detecting in a very short amount of time.
Sound: Lots of dialogue. All monologue. No one else speaks other than him (which helps with the identification of his character). There is good use of the metal-detector noise (beep) which acts as a sound effect during a montage of the artifacts that he has obtained.
Narrative: There isn't really a full narrative in this film as it is mainly just him giving a bit of infomation about himself and his love for metal-detecting, BUT he does tell stories about what he would do when he was a young boy and gives a picture of himself with his first ever detector. These, I guess, count as narrative within the film.
Identification: The film is very good at making the viewer identify with the 'protagonist'. One way it does this is by giving nearly all the on screen-time to him. Also his voice is heard throughout the whole thing which also helps. Smaller things that help a lot with identification with the character is that the film has a reaction shot of himself laughing at the list of strange things he has found, he laughs at "cannonball". The way this is done is that the voice-over from the shot before goes over another shot of him laughing, you don't actually hear the laugh but you can tell from his face that he is.
Suspense: There is not really any suspense used OR needed in this film as it is a mini-documentary about a man who is a metal-detectorist.
No comments:
Post a Comment